Assessment: Dubai Case Study
For the case study, students will prepare an assessment of between 1100 and 1200 words of text, 1.5 spaced. Each case study should have a separate bibliography including at least 2 references beyond lecture material, using APA format. Bibliography does not count towards word count. Each assessment should have:
1. Title
2. Topic sentence (a single sentence or two which summarize the students understanding of the situation, the actions taken by the consulting engineer, and lessons learned)
3. Situation assessment (What was the factual situation on the ground? What were the main challenges? What role could, and should, the consulting engineer play? What ESEM principles are present?)
4. Lessons learned (this should include not just the lessons learned by the consulting engineer as expressed in the case study, but the lessons learned by the student looking at the case study as a whole)
Dubai Case Study: Please review the video and follow the rubric posted below.
Summer 2020 Case Study Rubric
Summer 2020 Case Study Rubric
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Title
2.5 pts
Full Marks
Title present.
0 pts
No Marks
Title not present.
2.5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Topic Sentence
2.5 pts
Full Marks
A single sentence or two which summarize the students understanding of the situation, the actions taken by the consulting engineer, and lessons learned.
0 pts
No Marks
Topic sentence not present.
2.5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Situation Assessment
15 pts
Full Marks
The following prompts are addressed: What was the factual situation on the ground? What were the main challenges? What role could, and should, the consulting engineer play?
8 pts
Partial Marks
Some of the following prompts are addressed: What was the factual situation on the ground? What were the main challenges? What role could, and should, the consulting engineer play?
0 pts
No Marks
None of the following prompts are addressed: What was the factual situation on the ground? What were the main challenges? What role could, and should, the consulting engineer play?
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Discussion of ESEM Principles
15 pts
Full Marks
ESEM principles are mentioned and discussed in the essay.
8 pts
Partial Marks
ESEM principles are mentioned but not discussed in the essay.
0 pts
No Marks
ESEM principles are not mentioned or discussed in the essay.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Lessons Learned
10 pts
Full Marks
Lessons of the consultant engineer and the student are present.
5 pts
Partial Marks
Only lessons learned by the consultant engineer or the student are present.
0 pts
No Marks
No lessons learned are present.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Between 1,100 and 1,200 Words
20 pts
Full Marks
Within given range.
10 pts
Partial Marks
Within 100 words over or under.
0 pts
No Marks
Under 1,000 words or above 1,300 words.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Proper Grammar and Spelling
20 pts
Full Marks
No errors or minor grammar and spelling errors.
10 pts
Partial Points
Spelling and grammar errors distract from essay.
0 pts
No Marks
Spelling and grammar errors make essay incomprehensible.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome 1.5 Spacing
5 pts
Full Marks
1.5 spacing used.
0 pts
No Marks
1.5 spacing not used.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome 2 References
Credit only awarded for the following two criteria if 2 references are present.
0 pts
Full Marks
0 pts
No Marks
0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome In-text APA Citations
5 pts
Full Marks
In-text APA citations present.
0 pts
No Marks
No in-text citations or APA not used.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome APA Bibliography
5 pts
Full Marks
APA bibliography present.
0 pts
No Marks
No bibliography or APA not used.
5 pts
Recent Comments